Ultra 7 265 vs E1-7010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP41851
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E1-7010 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.