Celeron G6900E vs E1-7010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP41700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 710
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe version2.05.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-7010 127
Celeron G6900E 1559
+1128%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-7010 220
Celeron G6900E 2815
+1180%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2015 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 46 Watt

E1-7010 has 360% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 227 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.