AMD EPYC 7H12 vs E1-6010

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 314$
Games supported 10%
AMD E1-6010
AMD E1-6010
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
AMD EPYC 7H12
AMD EPYC 7H12
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 4165$
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparing E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ratingnot rated2
Place by popularityno data29
Value for moneyno data11.74
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date29 April 2014
(8 years old)
18 September 2019
(3 years old)
Current price$314 $4165
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

no data
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierno data+

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT3bTR4
Thermal design power (TDP)10 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4no data
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version2.0no data

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


  • Passmark

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

E1-6010 529
EPYC 7H12 100817
+18958%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms E1-6010 by 18958% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 29 April 2014 18 September 2019
Boost clock speed 1350 3300
Base clock speed 0 2600
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 10 Watt 280 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

and

AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-6010 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.


Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 303 ratings

Rate AMD E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 433 ratings

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.