i5-14400F vs E1-2150
Primary details
Comparing E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 412 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 60.51 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 23.69 |
| Architecture codename | Kabini (2013−2014) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $196 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.05 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 215 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT3 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 February 2014 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 65 Watt |
E1-2150 has 622.2% lower power consumption.
i5-14400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 400% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E1-2150 is a notebook processor while Core i5-14400F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-2150 and Core i5-14400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
