Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs E-450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2)
Release date22 August 2011 (12 years ago)7 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$125 no data

Detailed specifications

E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm
Die size75 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFP6
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6320AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E-450 765
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15218
+1889%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 1889% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-450 109
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1344
+1133%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 1133% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-450 176
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 5127
+2813%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 2813% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E-450 1063
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+689%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 689% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E-450 2021
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574
+1364%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 1364% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E-450 1035
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 11008
+964%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 964% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E-450 64.5
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 3.95
+1533%

E-450 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 1533% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E-450 1
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16
+2445%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 2445% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E-450 0.32
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 2.12
+563%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 563% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 0.1
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 7.1
+7733%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 7733% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 489
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4227
+764%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 764% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 3
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 80
+2665%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 2665% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 16
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 202
+1149%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms E-450 by 1149% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 August 2011 7 May 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 469 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 129 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-450 or Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.