Ryzen 5 8640HS vs E-450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-450
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.43
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
11.27
+2521%

Ryzen 5 8640HS outperforms E-450 by a whopping 2521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3200789
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.5643.16
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date22 August 2011 (14 years ago)6 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-450 and Ryzen 5 8640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm4 nm
Die size75 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and Ryzen 5 8640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFP8
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and Ryzen 5 8640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and Ryzen 5 8640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and Ryzen 5 8640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6320AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-450 and Ryzen 5 8640HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E-450 0.43
Ryzen 5 8640HS 11.27
+2521%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E-450 765
Samples: 1259
Ryzen 5 8640HS 19860
+2496%
Samples: 188

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-450 109
Ryzen 5 8640HS 2121
+1846%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-450 188
Ryzen 5 8640HS 7983
+4146%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-450 1063
Ryzen 5 8640HS 7163
+574%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-450 2021
Ryzen 5 8640HS 38415
+1801%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

E-450 0.1
Ryzen 5 8640HS 10.8
+11900%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

E-450 3
Ryzen 5 8640HS 109
+3665%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

E-450 16
Ryzen 5 8640HS 260
+1509%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 11.27
Integrated graphics card 0.35 13.02
Recency 22 August 2011 6 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 28 Watt

E-450 has 55.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8640HS, on the other hand, has a 2520.9% higher aggregate performance score, 3620% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E-450 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 597 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 111 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E-450 and Ryzen 5 8640HS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.