Atom x5-Z8300 vs E-450

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Series5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date22 August 2011 (12 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price$125 $197

Technical specs

E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz1.84 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallUTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protectionno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6320Intel HD Graphics
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data1
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E-450 765
Atom x5-Z8300 814
+6.4%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 6% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-450 109
Atom x5-Z8300 132
+21.1%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-450 176
Atom x5-Z8300 363
+106%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 106% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E-450 1063
+12.8%
Atom x5-Z8300 942

E-450 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 13% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E-450 2021
Atom x5-Z8300 2934
+45.2%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 45% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E-450 1035
Atom x5-Z8300 1691
+63.5%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 63% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E-450 64.5
Atom x5-Z8300 36.4
+77.2%

E-450 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 77% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E-450 1
Atom x5-Z8300 1
+88.7%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 89% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E-450 0.32
Atom x5-Z8300 0.35
+9.4%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 9% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 0.1
Atom x5-Z8300 0.6
+567%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 567% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 489
Atom x5-Z8300 780
+59.5%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 60% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 16
Atom x5-Z8300 36
+121%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 121% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E-450 3
Atom x5-Z8300 7
+142%

Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms E-450 by 142% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 22 August 2011 2 March 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and Atom x5-Z8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Atom x5-Z8300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 455 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about E-450 or Atom x5-Z8300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.