Ultra 7 270K Plus vs E-300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.20
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
2026, $299
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
40.07
+19935%

Core Ultra 7 270K Plus outperforms E-300 by a whopping 19935% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3618106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.4613.18
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Arrow Lake Refresh (2026)
Release date22 August 2011 (14 years ago)11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads224
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm3 nm
Die size75 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVMIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-7200
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E-300 0.20
Ultra 7 270K Plus 40.07
+19935%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E-300 338
Samples: 981
Ultra 7 270K Plus 68593
+20194%
Samples: 1384

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-300 853
Ultra 7 270K Plus 12623
+1380%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-300 1176
Ultra 7 270K Plus 102789
+8641%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E-300 79
Ultra 7 270K Plus 2.33
+3291%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 40.07
Recency 22 August 2011 11 March 2026
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 40 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 125 Watt

E-300 has 594% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 270K Plus, on the other hand, has a 19935% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1233% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E-300 in performance tests.

Be aware that E-300 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 329 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 147 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 270K Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E-300 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.