Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) vs E-300
Primary details
Comparing E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Kentsfield (2007) |
| Release date | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 23 July 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $266 |
Detailed specifications
E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 62 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W).
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 August 2011 | 23 July 2007 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 95 Watt |
E-300 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 427.8% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-300 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-300 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
