Ryzen 7 3800X vs E-240

#ad 
Buy E-240
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-240
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 18 Watt
0.12
Ryzen 7 3800X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
14.39
+11892%

Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms E-240 by a whopping 11892% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3431530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.53
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency0.6413.11
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-240 and Ryzen 7 3800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E-240 and Ryzen 7 3800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallAM4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and Ryzen 7 3800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and Ryzen 7 3800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and Ryzen 7 3800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E-240 0.12
Ryzen 7 3800X 14.39
+11892%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E-240 195
Ryzen 7 3800X 23086
+11739%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-240 107
Ryzen 7 3800X 1704
+1493%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-240 111
Ryzen 7 3800X 8238
+7322%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 14.39
Recency 4 January 2011 7 July 2019
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 105 Watt

E-240 has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 3800X, on the other hand, has a 11891.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E-240 in performance tests.

Be aware that E-240 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 3800X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-240
E-240
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 63 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1815 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E-240 and Ryzen 7 3800X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.