EPYC 4564P vs Duron 900
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 126 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 37.72 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Duron | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.16 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Spitfire (2000−2001) | Raphael (2023−2026) |
| Release date | 2 April 2001 (25 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Duron 900 and EPYC 4564P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 200 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 9 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 64 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 100 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 25 million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Duron 900 and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | A | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Duron 900 and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Duron 900 and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 900 and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 Depends on motherboard | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Duron 900 and EPYC 4564P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 April 2001 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 170 Watt |
Duron 900 has 325% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 23 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Duron 900 and AMD EPYC 4564P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Duron 900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
