EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Duron 1400
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Duron | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 15 August 2003 (22 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $880 |
Detailed specifications
Duron 1400 and EPYC Embedded 3451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.15 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266.66 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10.5 | 21.5 |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 64 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 80.89 mm2 | 2x 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 37 Million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Duron 1400 and EPYC Embedded 3451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Duron 1400 and EPYC Embedded 3451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Duron 1400 and EPYC Embedded 3451 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 1400 and EPYC Embedded 3451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Duron 1400 and EPYC Embedded 3451.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 August 2003 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 100 Watt |
Duron 1400 has 75.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3451, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Duron 1400 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3451. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Duron 1400 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3451 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
