EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Duron 1000
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 218 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Duron | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.36 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Morgan (2001−2002) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 17 December 2001 (24 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Duron 1000 and EPYC Embedded 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.55 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 200 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 64 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 105.68 mm2 | 2x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | 25 million | 17,750 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Duron 1000 and EPYC Embedded 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | A | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 160 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Duron 1000 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Duron 1000 and EPYC Embedded 8224P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 1000 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 Depends on motherboard | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Duron 1000 and EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 December 2001 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 160 Watt |
Duron 1000 has 540% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 8224P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Duron 1000 and AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Duron 1000 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8224P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
