Ultra 5 245K vs m5-6Y57

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m5-6Y57
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.48
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.76
+1776%

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Core m5-6Y57 by a whopping 1776% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2169173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data78.91
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core m5no data
Power efficiency28.0121.02
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads414
Base clock speed1.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 GT/s159 MHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size98.57 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1750 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Smart Response+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 515Intel® Graphics
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1.9 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz8K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m5-6Y57 1.48
Ultra 5 245K 27.76
+1776%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m5-6Y57 2349
Ultra 5 245K 44090
+1777%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 27.76
Recency 1 September 2015 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 4 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

m5-6Y57 has 3025% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has a 1775.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 600% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m5-6Y57 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m5-6Y57 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y57 and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y57
Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 53 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 27 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y57 or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.