EPYC Embedded 2875 vs m3-8114Y
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Cannon Lake-Y (2018) | Grado (2025) |
| Release date | 5 May 2018 (7 years ago) | 9 December 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core m3-8114Y and EPYC Embedded 2875 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 123 mm2 | 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core m3-8114Y and EPYC Embedded 2875 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1440 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 75 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8114Y and EPYC Embedded 2875. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core m3-8114Y and EPYC Embedded 2875 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8114Y and EPYC Embedded 2875 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8114Y and EPYC Embedded 2875. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Iris Pro Plus | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8114Y and EPYC Embedded 2875.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 May 2018 | 9 December 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 75 Watt |
m3-8114Y has 167.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 2875, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core m3-8114Y and AMD EPYC Embedded 2875. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core m3-8114Y is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 2875 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
