Ultra X7 368H vs m3-7Y30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-7Y30
2016, $281
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.39
Core Ultra X7 368H
2026
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
18.48
+1229%

Core Ultra X7 368H outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by a whopping 1229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2442394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m3no data
Power efficiency13.0431.22
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Panther Lake (2026)
Release date30 August 2016 (9 years ago)5 January 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads416
Base clock speed1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache128 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3LPDDR5X-9600
Maximum memory size16 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 615Intel® Arc™ B390 GPU
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz2.5 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1012

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

m3-7Y30 1.39
Ultra X7 368H 18.48
+1229%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

m3-7Y30 2432
Samples: 330
Ultra X7 368H 32371
+1231%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 18.48
Recency 30 August 2016 5 January 2026
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 25 Watt

m3-7Y30 has 525% lower power consumption.

Ultra X7 368H, on the other hand, has a 1229.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core m3-7Y30 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-7Y30
Core m3-7Y30
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Core Ultra X7 368H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 125 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra X7 368H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core m3-7Y30 and Core Ultra X7 368H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.