Athlon 64 TF-20 vs m3-7Y30

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-7Y30
2016
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.63
+919%
Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16

Core m3-7Y30 outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20923300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m3AMD Athlon 64
Power efficiency34.300.61
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Sherman (2009)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/s667 MHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache128 KB0.1 MB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1515S1g1
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 615no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes10no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-7Y30 1.63
+919%
Athlon 64 TF-20 0.16

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

m3-7Y30 4086
+228%
Athlon 64 TF-20 1245

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

m3-7Y30 3407
+457%
Athlon 64 TF-20 612

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 0.16
Recency 30 August 2016 1 May 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 25 Watt

m3-7Y30 has a 918.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

The Core m3-7Y30 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon 64 TF-20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-7Y30
Core m3-7Y30
AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 115 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-7Y30 or Athlon 64 TF-20, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.