EPYC 9655P vs i9-9990XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9990XE
2019
14 cores / 28 threads, 255 Watt
18.99
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+427%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Core i9-9990XE by a whopping 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.982.62
Market segmentWorkstationServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency7.0523.66
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Turin (2024)
Release date3 January 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,800$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9990XE has 14% better value for money than EPYC 9655P.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)96
Threads28192
Base clock speed4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier40no data
L1 cache896 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache14 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket2066SP5
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes44128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9990XE 18.99
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+427%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9990XE 30162
EPYC 9655P 158845
+427%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.99 100.00
Recency 3 January 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 14 96
Threads 28 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 400 Watt

i9-9990XE has 56.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 426.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 585.7% more physical cores and 585.7% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9990XE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9990XE
Core i9-9990XE
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 37 votes

Rate Core i9-9990XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 102 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9990XE or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.