EPYC 7713 vs i9-9990XE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9990XE
2018
14 cores / 28 threads, 255 Watt
18.99
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.14
+175%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Core i9-9990XE by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.944.08
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.0521.93
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,800$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713 has 39% better value for money than i9-9990XE.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads28128
Base clock speed4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.68 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier4020
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socket2066SP3
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes44128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9990XE 18.99
EPYC 7713 52.14
+175%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9990XE 30162
EPYC 7713 82825
+175%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.99 52.14
Recency 19 October 2018 15 March 2021
Physical cores 14 64
Threads 28 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7713 has a 174.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 357.1% more physical cores and 357.1% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9990XE in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9990XE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7713 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9990XE and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9990XE
Core i9-9990XE
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 37 votes

Rate Core i9-9990XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9990XE or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.