Xeon Silver 4416+ vs i9-9940X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9940X
2018
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
17.62
Xeon Silver 4416+
2023
20 cores / 40 threads, 165 Watt
29.09
+65.1%

Xeon Silver 4416+ outperforms Core i9-9940X by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking354151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.3172.16
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency10.0516.60
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,387$1,186

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4416+ has 1259% better value for money than i9-9940X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads2840
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature88 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA20664677
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4000
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9940X 17.62
Xeon Silver 4416+ 29.09
+65.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9940X 27995
Xeon Silver 4416+ 46208
+65.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.62 29.09
Recency 19 October 2018 10 January 2023
Physical cores 14 20
Threads 28 40
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Xeon Silver 4416+ has a 65.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 42.9% more physical cores and 42.9% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Silver 4416+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9940X in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9940X is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4416+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9940X and Xeon Silver 4416+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9940X
Core i9-9940X
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
Xeon Silver 4416+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 38 votes

Rate Core i9-9940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4416 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9940X or Xeon Silver 4416+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.