EPYC 9475F vs i9-9920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking430not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.09no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Turin (2024)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,189$7,592

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads2496
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size484 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066SP5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes44128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 48
Threads 24 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 400 Watt

i9-9920X has 142.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-9920X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9920X and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9920X
Core i9-9920X
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 15 votes

Rate Core i9-9920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9920X or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.