Xeon Silver 4109T vs Core i9-9900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900X
2018
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
14.10
+111%

i9-9900X outperforms Xeon Silver 4109T by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking487970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.738.19
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon Silver
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date8 October 2018 (5 years ago)11 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$989$501
Current price$468 (0.5x MSRP)$334 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900X has 68% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4109T.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache640 KB512 KB
L2 cache10 MB8 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)11 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature92 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900X 14.10
+111%
Xeon Silver 4109T 6.69

Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon Silver 4109T by 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-9900X 21801
+111%
Xeon Silver 4109T 10348

Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon Silver 4109T by 111% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.10 6.69
Recency 8 October 2018 11 July 2017
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Cost $989 $501
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 70 Watt

The Core i9-9900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4109T in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900X is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4109T is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900X and Xeon Silver 4109T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900X
Core i9-9900X
Intel Xeon Silver 4109T
Xeon Silver 4109T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 88 votes

Rate Core i9-9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4109T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900X or Xeon Silver 4109T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.