EPYC 7532 vs i9-9900T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900T
2019, $439
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
7.48
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
28.98
+287%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Core i9-9900T by a whopping 287% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1170205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.37no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.026.11
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)19 February 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$439no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2124
L1 cache512 KB2 MB
L2 cache2 MB16 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size180.3 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-9900T 7.48
EPYC 7532 28.98
+287%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-9900T 13105
Samples: 91
EPYC 7532 50765
+287%
Samples: 47

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-9900T 1461
+27.3%
EPYC 7532 1148

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-9900T 6453
EPYC 7532 10001
+55%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.48 28.98
Recency 23 April 2019 19 February 2020
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

i9-9900T has 471% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 287% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-9900T in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900T is a desktop processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 76 votes

Rate Core i9-9900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-9900T and EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.