Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs Core i9-9900KS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KS
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 127 Watt
12.60
+32.5%

i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking566752
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.766.87
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Xeon
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date28 October 2019 (4 years ago)2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$513no data
Current price$550 (1.1x MSRP)$146

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900KS has 86% better value for money than Xeon E5-2678 v3.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)3072 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size178 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C84 °C
Number of transistorsno data5,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1151LGA2011-3
Power consumption (TDP)127 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900KS 12.60
+32.5%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 9.51

Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-9900KS 19494
+32.5%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 14711

Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by 33% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-9900KS 1791
+80.2%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 994

Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by 80% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-9900KS 8657
+30.4%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 6640

Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by 30% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.60 9.51
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 127 Watt 120 Watt

The Core i9-9900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2678 v3 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900KS is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2678 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2678 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KS
Core i9-9900KS
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 171 vote

Rate Core i9-9900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2319 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900KS or Xeon E5-2678 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.