Xeon X3470 vs i9-9900KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KF
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.47
+457%
Xeon X3470
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.06

Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon X3470 by a whopping 457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6881906
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.450.28
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency11.432.05
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)8 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900KF has 2918% better value for money than Xeon X3470.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data296 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900KF 11.47
+457%
Xeon X3470 2.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900KF 18220
+457%
Xeon X3470 3269

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.47 2.06
Recency 8 January 2019 8 September 2009
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

i9-9900KF has a 456.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-9900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3470 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900KF is a desktop processor while Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KF and Xeon X3470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KF
Core i9-9900KF
Intel Xeon X3470
Xeon X3470

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 512 votes

Rate Core i9-9900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 744 votes

Rate Xeon X3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900KF or Xeon X3470, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.