Xeon Gold 6238 vs i9-9900KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KF
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.96
Xeon Gold 6238
2019
22 cores / 44 threads, 140 Watt
18.77
+56.9%

Xeon Gold 6238 outperforms Core i9-9900KF by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking659324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.9111.21
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$2,612

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6238 has 26% better value for money than i9-9900KF.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads1644
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache512 KB1.375 MB
L2 cache2 MB22 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)30.25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C92 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900KF 11.96
Xeon Gold 6238 18.77
+56.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900KF 18263
Xeon Gold 6238 28668
+57%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.96 18.77
Recency 7 January 2019 2 April 2019
Physical cores 8 22
Threads 16 44
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 140 Watt

i9-9900KF has 47.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6238, on the other hand, has a 56.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 175% more physical cores and 175% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6238 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9900KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900KF is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6238 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KF and Xeon Gold 6238, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KF
Core i9-9900KF
Intel Xeon Gold 6238
Xeon Gold 6238

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 493 votes

Rate Core i9-9900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6238 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900KF or Xeon Gold 6238, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.