Xeon E5-4620 v3 vs i9-9900KF

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KF
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.50
+73.5%
Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
6.63

Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E5-4620 v3 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6751031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.15no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency11.465.98
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C78 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900KF 11.50
+73.5%
Xeon E5-4620 v3 6.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900KF 18263
+73.5%
Xeon E5-4620 v3 10525

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.50 6.63
Recency 8 January 2019 1 June 2015
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

i9-9900KF has a 73.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 10.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4620 v3, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

The Core i9-9900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4620 v3 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900KF is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4620 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E5-4620 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KF
Core i9-9900KF
Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3
Xeon E5-4620 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 505 votes

Rate Core i9-9900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900KF or Xeon E5-4620 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.