Xeon E3-1268L v5 vs i9-9900KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KF
2019, $488
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
10.23
+185%
Xeon E3-1268L v5
2015, $377
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
3.59

Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1268L v5 by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8811674
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.180.52
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon E3
Power efficiency11.5511.00
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Skylake-DT (2015)
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)19 October 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$377

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900KF has 1088% better value for money than Xeon E3-1268L v5.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data122 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA11511151
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics P530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-9900KF 10.23
+185%
Xeon E3-1268L v5 3.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-9900KF 18033
+185%
Samples: 2299
Xeon E3-1268L v5 6334
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.23 3.59
Recency 8 January 2019 19 October 2015
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

i9-9900KF has a 185% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon E3-1268L v5, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-9900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900KF is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1268L v5 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KF
Core i9-9900KF
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5
Xeon E3-1268L v5

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 586 votes

Rate Core i9-9900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1268L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-9900KF and Xeon E3-1268L v5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.