Xeon Platinum 8160M vs i9-9900K

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900K
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.49
Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
33.47
+191%

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Core i9-9900K by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking676116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.696.18
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)Intel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency11.4521.12
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$7,704

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900K has 24% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8160M.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache2 MB24 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)33 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA-1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth44.668 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900K 11.49
Xeon Platinum 8160M 33.47
+191%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900K 18258
Xeon Platinum 8160M 53158
+191%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.49 33.47
Recency 8 October 2018 25 April 2017
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 48
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 150 Watt

i9-9900K has an age advantage of 1 year, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8160M, on the other hand, has a 191.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9900K in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900K is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8160M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900K and Xeon Platinum 8160M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900K
Core i9-9900K
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2380 votes

Rate Core i9-9900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900K or Xeon Platinum 8160M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.