Xeon E5-1680 v3 vs Core i9-9900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.67
+25.5%

i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v3 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking710877
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.54no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)8 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$439no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket11512011-3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSXno data+
SIPP+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2133
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900 10.67
+25.5%
Xeon E5-1680 v3 8.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900 16506
+25.5%
Xeon E5-1680 v3 13149

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.67 8.50
Recency 23 April 2019 8 September 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt

i9-9900 has a 25.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-9900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1680 v3 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-1680 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900 and Xeon E5-1680 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900
Core i9-9900
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3
Xeon E5-1680 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 370 votes

Rate Core i9-9900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 25 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1680 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900 or Xeon E5-1680 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.