Core i5-12400F vs Core i9-9820X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i9-9820X
2018
10 cores / 20 threads
13.09
+2.7%
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads
12.75

Core i9-9820X outperforms Core i5-12400F by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking523539
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Value for money12.8159.09
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date19 October 2018 (5 years old)4 January 2022 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$898no data
Current price$497 (0.6x MSRP)$168
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-12400F has 361% better value for money than i9-9820X.

Technical specs

Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9820X 13.09
+2.7%
i5-12400F 12.75

Core i9-9820X outperforms Core i5-12400F by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-9820X 20045
+2.6%
i5-12400F 19536

Core i9-9820X outperforms Core i5-12400F by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 13.09 12.75
Recency 19 October 2018 4 January 2022
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9820X and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9820X
Core i9-9820X
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 38 votes

Rate Intel Core i9-9820X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10174 votes

Rate Intel Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9820X or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.