Core i9-12900HK vs Core i9-8950HK

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i9-8950HK
2018
6 cores / 12 threads
6.83
Core i9-12900HK
2022
14 cores / 20 threads
18.03
+164%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 164% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking927305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Alder Lake-P
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Alder Lake-H (2022)
Release date2 April 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$583no data
Current price$1237 (2.1x MSRP)no data

Detailed Specifications

Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size149 mm2217 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR4, DDR5, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-8950HK 6.83
i9-12900HK 18.03
+164%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 164% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-8950HK 10559
i9-12900HK 27888
+164%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 164% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i9-8950HK 7149
i9-12900HK 8561
+19.8%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 20% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i9-8950HK 36591
i9-12900HK 53020
+44.9%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 45% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i9-8950HK 11055
i9-12900HK 16756
+51.6%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 52% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i9-8950HK 8.08
i9-12900HK 3.38
+139%

Core i9-8950HK outperforms Core i9-12900HK by 139% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i9-8950HK 13
i9-12900HK 28
+113%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 113% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-8950HK 1224
i9-12900HK 2845
+133%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 133% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-8950HK 195
i9-12900HK 257
+31.8%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 32% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i9-8950HK 2.24
i9-12900HK 2.99
+33.5%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 33% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-8950HK 7.2
i9-12900HK 15.2
+111%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 111% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-8950HK 6421
i9-12900HK 8480
+32.1%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 32% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-8950HK 225
i9-12900HK 288
+28.1%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 28% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-8950HK 78
i9-12900HK 137
+75.4%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms Core i9-8950HK by 75% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 6.83 18.03
Recency 2 April 2018 4 January 2022
Physical cores 6 14
Threads 12 20

The Core i9-12900HK is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-8950HK in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-8950HK and Core i9-12900HK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-8950HK
Core i9-8950HK
Intel Core i9-12900HK
Core i9-12900HK

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 103 votes

Rate Core i9-8950HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 57 votes

Rate Core i9-12900HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-8950HK or Core i9-12900HK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.