EPYC 7642 vs i9-7980XE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7980XE
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
19.66
EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
38.42
+95.4%

EPYC 7642 outperforms Core i9-7980XE by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.765.23
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.8615.57
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$4,775

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7642 has 89% better value for money than i9-7980XE.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3696
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache1.125 MB3 MB
L2 cache18 MB24 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size484 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature94 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066TR4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7980XE 19.66
EPYC 7642 38.42
+95.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7980XE 30094
EPYC 7642 58795
+95.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-7980XE 1444
+13.3%
EPYC 7642 1274

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-7980XE 11241
+7.3%
EPYC 7642 10479

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.66 38.42
Recency 30 May 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 18 48
Threads 36 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 225 Watt

i9-7980XE has 36.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7642, on the other hand, has a 95.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-7980XE in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7980XE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7642 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7980XE and EPYC 7642, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7980XE
Core i9-7980XE
AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 278 votes

Rate Core i9-7980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7980XE or EPYC 7642, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.