i9-10900F vs i9-7960X

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7960X
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 165 Watt
18.14
+44.9%
Core i9-10900F
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.52

Core i9-7960X outperforms Core i9-10900F by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking336622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.25no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency10.4018.23
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache22 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature98 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++

Security technologies

Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7960X 18.14
+44.9%
i9-10900F 12.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7960X 28808
+44.8%
i9-10900F 19891

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-7960X 1307
i9-10900F 1703
+30.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-7960X 10286
+21.9%
i9-10900F 8441

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.14 12.52
Recency 1 September 2017 30 April 2020
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

i9-7960X has a 44.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

i9-10900F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7960X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7960X and Core i9-10900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7960X
Core i9-7960X
Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 46 votes

Rate Core i9-7960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 339 votes

Rate Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7960X or Core i9-10900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.