Xeon Phi 7290 vs i9-7940X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7940X
2017, $1,399
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
14.44
+42.7%

Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon Phi 7290 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking557892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.384.43
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date1 September 2017 (8 years ago)20 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads28288
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)32 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature102 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA20663647
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt245 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-7940X 14.44
+42.7%
Xeon Phi 7290 10.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-7940X 25452
+42.7%
Samples: 489
Xeon Phi 7290 17839
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.44 10.12
Recency 1 September 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 14 72
Threads 28 288
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 245 Watt

i9-7940X has a 42.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 48.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7290, on the other hand, has 414.3% more physical cores and 928.6% more threads.

The Intel Core i9-7940X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7940X is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7290 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 60 votes

Rate Core i9-7940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 42 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-7940X and Xeon Phi 7290, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.