Ryzen 7 8700F vs i9-7940X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7940X
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
16.34
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.52
+19.5%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Core i9-7940X by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking408292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3055.73
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.3828.44
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 8700F has 1589% better value for money than i9-7940X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2816
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size484 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066AM5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7940X 16.34
Ryzen 7 8700F 19.52
+19.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7940X 25963
Ryzen 7 8700F 30999
+19.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.34 19.52
Recency 1 September 2017 1 April 2024
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 28 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

i9-7940X has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has a 19.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-7940X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 43 votes

Rate Core i9-7940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 256 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7940X or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.