5 320 vs i9-7940X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7940X
2017, $1,399
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
14.58
+67.8%

Core i9-7940X outperforms Core 5 320 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6251092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3511.04
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency3.72no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Wildcat Lake (2026)
Release date30 May 2017 (9 years ago)16 April 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399$340

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 5 320 has 718% better value for money than i9-7940X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads286
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache896 KB192 KB
L2 cache14 MB2.5 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature102 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066Intel BGA 1516
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5, LPDDR5X
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes446

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-7940X 14.58
+67.8%
Core 5 320 8.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-7940X 25228
+67.8%
Samples: 517
Core 5 320 15033
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.58 8.69
Recency 30 May 2017 16 April 2026
Physical cores 14 6
Threads 28 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 15 Watt

i9-7940X has a 68% higher aggregate performance score, and 133% more physical cores and 367% more threads.

Core 5 320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 1000% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-7940X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 5 320 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7940X is a desktop processor while Core 5 320 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 62 votes

Rate Core i9-7940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-7940X and Core 5 320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.