Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs Core i9-7920X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i9-7920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads
15.27
+20.5%
Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads
12.67

Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v4 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking406543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation13.2011.90
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date10 September 2017 (6 years ago)20 June 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199$2,090
Current price$434 (0.4x MSRP)$50 (0x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-7920X has 11% better value for money than Xeon E5-2690 v4.

Detailed Specifications

Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2428
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3.5 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)35 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4440

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7920X 15.27
+20.5%
Xeon E5-2690 v4 12.67

Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v4 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-7920X 23616
+20.5%
Xeon E5-2690 v4 19602

Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v4 by 20% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-7920X 1359
+29.8%
Xeon E5-2690 v4 1047

Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v4 by 30% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-7920X 9077
+20.3%
Xeon E5-2690 v4 7548

Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v4 by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 15.27 12.67
Recency 10 September 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 12 14
Threads 24 28
Cost $1199 $2090
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 135 Watt

The Core i9-7920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2690 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-7920X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2690 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7920X and Xeon E5-2690 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Core i9-7920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1289 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7920X or Xeon E5-2690 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.