Pro A12-8800B vs i9-7920X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
14.89
+819%
Pro A12-8800B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.62

Core i9-7920X outperforms Pro A12-8800B by a whopping 819% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4712082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD Carrizo
Power efficiency10.074.38
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date10 September 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2066FP4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt12-35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512HSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3/DDR3L-2133
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Number of pipelinesno data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7920X 14.89
+819%
Pro A12-8800B 1.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7920X 23651
+817%
Pro A12-8800B 2580

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-7920X 1373
+161%
Pro A12-8800B 526

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-7920X 9207
+707%
Pro A12-8800B 1141

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.89 1.62
Recency 10 September 2017 3 June 2015
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 12 Watt

i9-7920X has a 819.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A12-8800B, on the other hand, has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A12-8800B in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7920X is a desktop processor while Pro A12-8800B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7920X and Pro A12-8800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
AMD Pro A12-8800B
Pro A12-8800B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 37 votes

Rate Core i9-7920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Pro A12-8800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7920X or Pro A12-8800B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.