EPYC 7261 vs i9-7920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7920X
2017, $1,199
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
13.42
+111%

Core i9-7920X outperforms EPYC 7261 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6551273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.041.58
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date10 September 2017 (8 years ago)14 June 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C81 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066SP3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes44128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-7920X 13.42
+111%
EPYC 7261 6.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-7920X 23482
+111%
Samples: 409
EPYC 7261 11149
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.42 6.37
Recency 10 September 2017 14 June 2018
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 170 Watt

i9-7920X has a 111% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 21% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7261, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

The Intel Core i9-7920X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7261 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7920X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7261 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 46 votes

Rate Core i9-7920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7261 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-7920X and EPYC 7261, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.