Xeon E5-2682 v4 vs Core i9-7900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7900X
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.64
+11.6%
Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
12.22

i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2682 v4 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking530616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.29no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)Intel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Broadwell (2014−2019)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0QPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier3321
L1 cache640 KBno data
L2 cache10 MB4 MB
L3 cache13.75 MB40 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSocket R4no data
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size128 GB1,536 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4440

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7900X 13.64
+11.6%
Xeon E5-2682 v4 12.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7900X 21092
+11.6%
Xeon E5-2682 v4 18898

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.64 12.22
Recency 30 May 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 120 Watt

i9-7900X has a 11.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

Xeon E5-2682 v4, on the other hand, has 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2682 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7900X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2682 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2682 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 204 votes

Rate Core i9-7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 122 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7900X or Xeon E5-2682 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.