Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i9-7900X

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	508	1397
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.72	4.22
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	Core i9 (Desktop)	no data
Architecture codename	Skylake-X (2018)	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Release date	26 June 2017 (7 years ago)	March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$313
Current price	$864 (0.9x MSRP)	$70 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-7900X has 12% better value for money than Xeon E5-1620.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	20	8
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.5 GHz	3.8 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	14 MB (shared)	10240 KB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	294 mm2
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	64 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1270 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	Socket R4	FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	Intel® AVX
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	+	no data
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	+
Identity Protection	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	128 GB	375 GB
Max memory channels	4	4
Maximum memory bandwidth	85 GB/s	51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	44	40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 by 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	13.65	3.79
Physical cores	10	4
Threads	20	8
Cost	$999	$313
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	130 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-1620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---