Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs i9-14900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.50
+452%
Ryzen Embedded R2544
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.34

Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen Embedded R2544 by a whopping 452% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1451179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation50.70no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency42.9511.23
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-R (2023−2024)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)30 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2 GHz3.35 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm12 nm
Die size257 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-14900F 29.50
+452%
Ryzen Embedded R2544 5.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-14900F 46860
+452%
Ryzen Embedded R2544 8486

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.50 5.34
Recency 8 January 2024 30 September 2022
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 32 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

i9-14900F has a 452.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 500% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen Embedded R2544, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-14900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R2544 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-14900F and Ryzen Embedded R2544, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F
AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544
Ryzen Embedded R2544

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded R2544 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-14900F or Ryzen Embedded R2544, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.