Ryzen 7 7435HS vs i9-14900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.52
+95.9%
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
15.07

Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 7 7435HS by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking144469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation50.80no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataRyzen 7000 Series
Power efficiency42.9831.69
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-R (2023−2024)Rembrandt R
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads3216
Base clock speed2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm6 nm
Die size257 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2USB 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-14900F 29.52
+95.9%
Ryzen 7 7435HS 15.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-14900F 46884
+95.9%
Ryzen 7 7435HS 23932

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.52 15.07
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

i9-14900F has a 95.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7435HS, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-14900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7435HS in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-14900F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7435HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7435HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
Ryzen 7 7435HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 97 votes

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 660 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7435HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-14900F or Ryzen 7 7435HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.