Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-13900TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900TE
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 35 Watt
10.23
Core i7-13790F
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
29.81
+191%

i7-13790F outperforms i9-13900TE by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking706131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-SRaptor Lake-S
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die size257 mm2257 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket17001700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900TE 10.23
i7-13790F 29.81
+191%

Core i7-13790F outperforms Core i9-13900TE by 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-13900TE 15819
i7-13790F 46110
+191%

Core i7-13790F outperforms Core i9-13900TE by 191% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.23 29.81
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 32 24
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-13790F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900TE and Core i7-13790F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900TE
Core i9-13900TE
Intel Core i7-13790F
Core i7-13790F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Core i9-13900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 54 votes

Rate Core i7-13790F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900TE or Core i7-13790F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.