Ultra 5 125H vs i9-13900KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.81
+159%
Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.58

i9-13900KF outperforms Ultra 5 125H by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking83489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Meteor Lake-H
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date27 September 2022 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$564no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads3218
Base clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1.5 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2028
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900KF 37.81
+159%
Ultra 5 125H 14.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900KF 58484
+159%
Ultra 5 125H 22544

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.81 14.58
Recency 27 September 2022 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 32 18
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 28 Watt

i9-13900KF has a 159.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 71.4% more physical cores and 77.8% more threads.

Ultra 5 125H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 346.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 125H in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900KF is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 125H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 5 125H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 602 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 278 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900KF or Core Ultra 5 125H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.