Xeon E-2436 vs i9-13900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
33.42
+127%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E-2436 by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking122503
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.1397.99
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency46.7920.62
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2436 has 72% better value for money than i9-13900F.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900F 33.42
+127%
Xeon E-2436 14.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900F 51041
+127%
Xeon E-2436 22487

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.42 14.73
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 32 12

i9-13900F has a 126.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Xeon E-2436, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2436 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900F is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900F and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900F or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.