Xeon 6517P vs i9-13900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
27.96
Xeon 6517P
2025
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.38
+1.5%

Xeon 6517P outperforms Core i9-13900F by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking204200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency18.196.31
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)no data
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads3232
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache36 MB (shared)72 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2488

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-13900F 27.96
Xeon 6517P 28.38
+1.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-13900F 49134
Samples: 388
Xeon 6517P 49876
+1.5%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.96 28.38
Recency 4 January 2023 1 January 2025
Physical cores 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 190 Watt

i9-13900F has 50% more physical cores, and 192.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6517P, on the other hand, has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Xeon 6517P.

Note that Core i9-13900F is a desktop processor while Xeon 6517P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F
Intel Xeon 6517P
Xeon 6517P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 190 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6517P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-13900F and Xeon 6517P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.