Xeon 6315P vs i9-13900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900E
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
23.17
+263%

Core i9-13900E outperforms Xeon 6315P by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2581165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.15
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency14.994.89
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Threads324
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-13900E 23.17
+263%
Xeon 6315P 6.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-13900E 40505
+262%
Xeon 6315P 11179

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.17 6.39
Recency 4 January 2023 24 February 2025
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 32 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

i9-13900E has a 262.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Xeon 6315P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-13900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6315P in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900E is a desktop processor while Xeon 6315P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900E
Core i9-13900E
Intel Xeon 6315P
Xeon 6315P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i9-13900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Xeon 6315P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-13900E and Xeon 6315P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.