Processor 300 vs i9-13900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900E
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
21.44
+375%
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51

Core i9-13900E outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 375% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900E and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2541319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency31.209.27
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900E and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads324
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die size257 mm2163 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900E and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket17001700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900E and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900E and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900E and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900E and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900E and Processor 300.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900E 21.44
+375%
Processor 300 4.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900E 34049
+376%
Processor 300 7160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.44 4.51
Integrated graphics card 6.16 2.86
Recency 4 January 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 32 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 46 Watt

i9-13900E has a 375.4% higher aggregate performance score, 115.4% faster integrated GPU, and 1100% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 41.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900E and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900E
Core i9-13900E
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i9-13900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900E or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.